Assumptions and method

When to be cautious

Assumes independent durations on a fixed path. Alternative paths, correlation and resource constraints invalidate a project-confidence interpretation.

Mean = Σ(O+4M+P)/6; variance = Σ[(P−O)/6]²

Test a scenario

Use your own inputs

Inputs stay in your browser. Shared scenario links include your inputs.

Use the result in a decision

Check dependencies, duration assumptions and resource availability.

Assumes independent durations on a fixed path. Alternative paths, correlation and resource constraints invalidate a project-confidence interpretation.

Set a baseline and change one assumption to compare outcomes.

A worked example

Follow the fixed teaching example
  1. Activity means are (3 + 4×5 + 9)/6 and (2 + 4×4 + 6)/6: 5.3333 and 4 days.
  2. Their sum is 9.3333 days. Sum variances 1 + 4/9 = 1.4444 days², then take the square root for 1.2019 days.

These illustrative inputs describe a project scenario, not a published benchmark. All monetary inputs use the same currency and price basis.

One activity per line: optimistic, most likely, pessimistic
3, 5, 9 2, 4, 6
Fixed-path mean
9.3333 days
Fixed-path standard deviation
1.2019 days
Variance
1.4444 days²

Interpret the output only within the assumptions above. Changing the inputs changes the result; it does not validate the inputs.

Source & credit

D. G. Malcolm, J. H. Roseboom, C. E. Clark and W. Fazar, Application of a Technique for Research and Development Program Evaluation (1959). This calculator uses a simplified fixed-path approximation, not the entire original procedure.

Malcolm, Roseboom, Clark & Fazar (1959): PERT

This is independently written code and explanation of the underlying method. The linked publication, its diagrams and its trademarks remain its owner’s material; no permission to reuse them is implied.

Learn and apply

Explore schedule: guides, calculations and sources